Political Attitudes Advocated in 1984

Political Attitudes Advocated in 1984 (AP PROMPT) 1987-Some novels and plays seem to advocate changes in social or political attitudes or in traditions. Choose such a novel or play and note briefly the particular attitudes or traditions that the author on the face of it wishes to modify. Then analyze the techniques the author uses to influence the readers or audiences views. keep down plot summary. Do not write about a film or television program.The field sixty years ago as seen by George Orwell was a different place than the one we operate in and experience today. Technology was quickly developing and become a part of daily life. atomic warfare was salve a new threat, and the aftershock of its use in World War II was still raw in everyones minds. Totalitarianism was seen as a social experiment of sorts, and not having hitherto experienced the Cold War, some of Americas great minds were still looking at these governments with an kick in mind.Orwell thought that society neede d to be forewarned about both the possible and real dangers of these issues, so his manifesto, 1984, was his name for social change, his call to respect the dangers that technology, war, and undemocraticism introduced. In 1984, George Orwell goes along the same lines as many new(prenominal) influential contemporary authors such as Kurt Vonnegut and Margaret Atwood to create a perfect negative utopia.In this fancied society, Oceania, the government hands out cruelty, oppression, and propaganda as is they were food stamps, and every single aspect of the society, down to daybook entries, private conversations, and correct personal thoughts, is monitored by the company through intrusive devices called telescreens. The Party uses everything at its temperament to enforce complete and utter control, from an editing of language to constant surveillance, from historical factual manipulation to visible and psychological torture.As a result of the governments inadequate ruling and const ant manipulation, the members of the Party live in an urban, industrial conflagration. Orwell vividly and continuously demonstrates the effects of this broken society, and the picture he paints isnt a pleasant one Oceania is constantly at war, Party members must completely succumb to rashness and con realizeity to survive, the society is living in a state of decay and poverty, inequality is wide-spread and all consuming, and even the structure and loyalty of families is almost entirely dissolved.The fact that Orwells Oceania is modeled after the totalitarian governments of the mid(prenominal) twentieth century is a thinly veiled one, and the critique of these societies is more than obvious. His depicted object, though, isnt reserved single for these communistic cultures its also directed at us. The moral of the story isnt just that totalitarian governments, psychological manipulation, and misuse of technology are bad, its also that we cant obliviously sit endorse and allow such crimes against humanity to continue or even gain power in the outgrowth place.Orwells warning is effective, too, because he wasnt just creating a dystopia, he was literally suggesting that this fictional hell could become our reality in thirty-five years if we didnt change the way we looked at things. We did consider it past 1984 without devolving into this reality, but the social commentary presented is still relevant and will always continue to be, because the message really is to keep questioning the world around us and not accept any form of oppression, and thats one that is important enough to keep in mind for the entire foreseeable future.