Sunday, April 7, 2019
Kant vs. Hegel Essay Example for Free
Kant vs. Hegel EssayHegels belief of the Absolute Idea claims that there is a habitual and ideal standard that is continuously being revealed throughout history, in various forms of human expression. The Absolute Idea can be interpreted as God, nature, spirit, or reality. With contrivance, there is no such thing as prowess for Arts sake because fine art is a manifestation of the unfolding of the Absolute Idea. In Hegels Art History, the progression of art is eternally moving closer to ultimate reality, because spiritual realization is teleological. The Absolute is fully realized when form and pith are harmonious and concrete in their depiction of spirit and man. Beauty is dependent upon these things.For Hegel, the classical flow rate is characterized by the depiction of ideal beauty in the perfect human body in past Greek sculpture. However, the concreteness of the human body is later seen as limited for not representing spirit and imagination in a more abstract form. T herefore, Hegels ideal of beauty is ever changing according to Arts development in history, and his terms. In other words, Hegel calls the shots. In contrast to Hegel, Kants philosophy of art was a deliberate attempt to remove personal subjectivity. Like Hegel, Kant did believe there was a universal beauty, or Absolute of something, except Kant did not have any references to measure this by.For Kant, we can only sum up to know what is really beautiful when one has no agenda, concept, or comparison to measure the object with. From Kants perspective, Hegel is attached to all of these things, and therefore he can not really know beauty outback(a) of his own perception. It is an intuitive inner keen, versus a cognitive knowing. This is significantly different from Hegels ideal of beauty, since knowing what is really beautiful can never be answered concretely, but rather intuitively.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.