Brief History Of Databases :: essays research papers

Brief History Of DatabasesIn the 1960s, the use of main frame computers became widespread in manycompanies. To access immense amounts of stored study, these companiesstarted to use computer programs like COBOL and FORTRAN. Data accessibility anddata sharing soon became an important feature because of the large amount ofinformation recquired by diverse departments within certain companies. Withthis system, each application owns its own data wedges. The problems thusassociated with this type of file processing was uncontrolled redundancy,inconsistent data, inflexibility, poor enforcement of standards, and low coder maintenance.In 1964, MIS ( solicitude Information Systems) was introduced. Thiswould prove to be very influential towards future designs of computer systemsand the methods they will use in manipulating data.In 1966, Philip Kotler had the first description of how managers could emolument from the powerful capabilities of the electronic computer as amanagement tool.In 196 9, Berson developed a marketing information system for marketingresearch. In 1970, the capital of Alabama urban model was developed stressing thequantitative aspect of management by highlighting a data bank, a model bank, anda measurement statistics bank. whole of these factors will be influential onfuture models of storing data in a pool. According to Martine, in 1981, adatabase is a shared collection of interrelate data designed to meet the needsof multiple types of end users. The data is stored in one location so that theyare independent of the programs that use them, retentiveness in mind data integritywith respect to the approaches to adding new data, modifying data, andretrieving existing data. A database is shared and perceived differently bymultiple users. This leads to the arrival of Database Management Systems.These systems first appeared around the 1970=s as solutions to problemsassociated with mainframe computers. Originally, pre-database programs accessedtheir own da ta files. Consequently, similar data had to be stored in otherareas where that certain piece of information was relevant. Simple things likeaddresses were stored in customer information files, accounts receivable records,and so on. This created redundancy and inefficiency. Updating files, likestoring files, was also a problem. When a customer=s address changed, all thefields where that customer=s address was stored had to be changed. If a fieldhappened to be missed, then an inconsistency was created. When requests todevelop new ways to manipulate and summarize data arose, it only added to theproblem of having files attached to specific applications. New system designhad to be done, including new programs and new data file storage methods. Theclose connection between data files and programs sent the costs for storage and

Marketing scenario

Positioned as an premium offering focused to lowest overall cost to shutdown users through superior overall performance. Leader in quality , performance and technological innovation Product railroads Carton sealing and industrial tapes Specialized adhesives different packaging yields SKI tape Manufactured using patented technology and a brand name for pressure untoughened carton sealing tapeEvery noble tensile strength and sheer resistance Positioning High Price K Products Low Quality High Quality pack Tensile revolutionary Product Low Price Problem Statement K tape competed against inferior economy grade ingatherings in carton sealing type obturate offered 25-35% lesser price Revenue of K- $68. 6 million PACK $28. 5 million 2012 Tensile -a new competitor had $2. 7 million dollar barter with one sales representative Should SST stay with high quality product or enter the economy grade segment ?Option 1 inaugurate the economy grade segment under the same brand PROS Acc ess to the economy segment Defend market share against competition Diversification of product portfolio CONS Dilution of the brand material body as a maker of technological superior product Conceptualization of its own product offering Accoutered product line Option 2 Enter the economy grade segment under different brand Implications for Customer Ability to fulfill need of price sensitive customers Possibility of change in perception of being a quality leaderDistributor Possibility to offer a low end SST product Even wider product range Limited sales force Sales Force Ability to offer more variety in terms of price levels More grounds to explain product differences Brand No positive impact Negative impact on brand image Option 2 Stay with high-quality products Maintaining image of quality Leader Loss of Market share Not targeting price sensitive consumers No need for adjustment in distribution policy.

College Enrollment Essay

Income inequality has been increasing for the past 20 days. A substantial part of the increase in income differences commode be explained by changes in the return to education. In vaulting horse terms, 1973 college graduates earned 45 percent more than heights school graduates by 1994 they earned 65 percent more, ground on real average hourly wages for college and high school graduates (Baumol and Blinder, 1997). The increasing income disparities mingled with groups of differing educational attainment raises concern that access to post chipary education (PSE) may non be as widespread as desired.President Clinton urged for the tendency of universal college access in his 1997 State of the Union address, We must(prenominal) make the thirteenth and quaternteenth years of educationat least 2 years of collegejust as universal in America by the 21st century as a high school education is today, and we must open the doors of college to only Americans. Using data from the natio nal grooming Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS) and the National Postsecondary scholarly person Aid Study (NPSAS), this study examines access to postsecondary education by mortals in different income and test score groups.While many studies have found a statistically significant effect of income on college registration,1 less attention has been p sanction to the effect of family income after controlling for scholarly person achievement. This study specifically addresses this issue. We besides search differences in the close of whether or non to come after PSE or in the type of PSE go toed. We argon interested in whether learners ar substituting less high-ticket(prenominal) alternatives ( much(prenominal) as public or 2-year institutions) for high cost institutions, or whether they are non touching PSE at all.However, we do not examine selectivity of institutions attended. An opposite goal of this study is to determine which operators, including high school experien ces, are especially crucial in ascertain college enrollment patterns. Hossler and Maple (1993) find that information on individual downplay factors al first bases them to predict, with a high degree of accuracy, which ninth-graders result go to college. The emphasis in our study is on how 1 See, for example, Leslie and Brinkman (1987), Savoca (1990), Schwartz (1986), and Mortenson and Wu (1990). SECTION I. presentment 1 MATHTECH, INC.early indicators, such as expectations and course-taking behavior in the eighth grade, are cerebrate to college attendance six years later. 2 Last, we explore whether monetary help oneself availability is a critical factor in determining PSE attendance. The combined effects of shifting federal support from grants to loans, and college instruction increasing at a rate express than inflation are expected to have a enceinte impact on enrollment patterns for wretched income youth. This report examines knowledge of and attitudes toward financia l aid, and the relationship between such factors and PSE attendance.We also examine the effect of financial aid receipt on PSE attendance. In summary, the main research questions addressed in this report are 1. 2. 3. 4. What percentage of students attend PSE, and what types of PSE do they attend? How are income and test score colligate to who goes to college? What factors, including high school experiences, are especially important in determining college enrollment patterns? Is financial aid availability a critical factor for determining PSE attendance? The rest of the report proceeds as follows.Section II describes the literature on individual and institutional factors that affect PSE attendance. Section III provides an overview of the data utilise in this report. It describes the NELS data, the NPSAS data, archetypes and weights used in the study, and correction of exemplar errors for have techniques. Section IV examines who goes to college. The section highlights the main an swers to the first two research questions posed above, in a univariate or multivariate framework. Section V examines factors related to PSE attendance.Section VI explores the importance of financial aid, including knowledge of financial aid, financial aid applications, and the relationship between being offered financial aid and PSE attendance. Last, we include a bibliography of cited references. The executive summary (at the beginning of the report) highlights our findings and provides policy implications. An NCES study, not yet released, has focused on the pipeline to higher education using the NELS data (NCES, 1997). SECTION I. INTRODUCTION 2 2 MATHTECH, INC. One subset of abbreviation for this study is the group of low income, high test score students.Low income, high test score students may have the potential to benefit greatly from PSE attendance and, therefore, we want to identify factors or constraints, particularly financial ones, that might limit the students educational opportunities beyond high school. SECTION I. INTRODUCTION 3 MATHTECH, INC. II. literary works REVIEW Much of the research on college enrollment patterns is founded upon the human capital model Gary Becker advanced. According to this theory, one decides to enroll in college as an investment in future earning power.Individuals calculate the value of attending college by comparing costs (direct and indirect) with expected income gains, and they make the decision that will maximize their utility over the long term. To understand enrollment behavior according to this model, it is necessary to look at such factors as tutorship levels, student financial aid, average wages for high school graduates, and the difference in lifetime earnings between high school and college graduates. Economists and others agree, however, that non-monetary factors also play a major part in the college enrollment decision.Sociologists models of status attainment have suggested a number of background variables that join with economic factors to influence college plans. These include twain personal traits (e. g. , academician ability) and interpersonal factors, such as the level of encouragement a student receives from parents and teachers. Hossler and Maple (1993) suggest that individual decisions on enrollment can be broken down into three stages predisposition, search, and choice. According to their research, students who will ultimately attend college can be differentiated from those who will not as early as the ninth grade.Within the econometric and sociological models outlined above, the factors touch enrollment in college can be divided into two general types those specific to individual students, such as academic achievement and parental education levels, and those specific to educational or vocational alternatives, such as college tuition, financial aid, and unemployment levels. bookmans enrollment decisions can be viewed as jointly determined by their individual characteristic s and the institutional or societal conditions that prevail. We first review individual traits that affect college enrollment, and then institutional determinants.SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 4 MATHTECH, INC. A. INDIVIDUAL FACTORS THAT mend COLLEGE ENROLLMENT Several studies have used data from the National Longitudinal Study of the broad(prenominal) tutor Class of 1972 (NLS72), the National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Market Experience, Youth Cohort (NLSY), and the laid-back School and Beyond Survey (HSB) to examine the factors affecting college enrollments. Manski and fresh (1983), Rouse (1994), and a number of others have used the variables included in these data sets to estimate polynomial logit models of enrollment decisions.Among the researchers, there seems to be broad agreement regarding the individual traits that help to determine enrollment. These traits are discussed below. Manski and keen-witted (1983) presented a bring up point, namely that the enrollment pro cess begins with the students decision to give to college. This is much more important than the decisions made by college admissions personnel, since most would-be college students are likely to be admitted to close to postsecondary institution of average quality.Jackson (1988) reports that in 1972, more than 97 percent of college applicants were admitted to at least one of their top three choices. The factors of greatest interest, then, are those that cause the student to seek to enroll. Both Manski and advisable (1983) and Rouse (1994) find that individual traits such as achievement levels, high school class rank, and parental education levels are of primary importance in determining the likelihood of a students applying to college.They state that higher family income levels increase the probability of application as well, but to a lesser extent. Manski and Wise also cite a peer or high school quality effect, such that the larger the share of a high school ageds classmates wh o attend 4-year schools, the more likely he or she will be to do the same. A recent NCES report (1997) describes the relationship among six risk of exposure factors (such as changing schools two or more times) and PSE attendance rates. St. sewer and Noell (1989) and St. John (1990) draw similar conclusions from the NLS72 and HSB data sets.St. John and Noell state that certain hearty background variables appear to make college enrollment more likely. These include higher test scores, higher grades, higher SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 MATHTECH, INC. get under ones skinly education levels,3 and family income, as cited by Manski and Wise and Rouse. Other key variables include participation in an academic track during high school and high postsecondary aspirations, as measured by students reporting of the highest level of schooling they expect to achieve.Hossler and Maple (1993) find that parental education levels have a stronger effect on enrollment plans than student ability or income level. Other background factors that researchers have found to be significant include the level of parental encouragement (Hossler, Braxton, and Coopersmith, 1989) and students own expectations about the college decision (Borus and Carpenter, 1984). Jackson (1988) concludes that test scores, grades, taking part in a college preparatory program, and attending a school with many college-going peers are the student attributes most important for college enrollment.Kohn, Manski, and Mundel (1976) report that parents education level has a positive effect on a students likelihood of enrollment, but state that this effect decreases as family income rises. A number of researchers have examined the effects of family income levels on college enrollment. Manski (199216) concludes that there are persistent patterns of stratification of college enrollments by income. Both Manski (1992) and Kane (1995) present census data for multi-year periods that show, for go income levels, a steadily increasing percentage of 18to 19-year-old dependent family members enrolled in college.Using the same data source, Clotfelter (1991) and Mortenson and Wu (1990) cite positive income effects for the 18- to 24year-old group as well. Hauser (1993) finds large family income effects on college enrollment for White and Hispanic families, but he finds no such effects for B pretermit families. 3 St. John and Noell do not include paternal education levels as a variable in their study. Manski and Wise and Rouse consider maternal and paternal education levels as identify variables, but present their conclusions in terms of parental education levels as a whole.Most of the studies reviewed here do not distinguish between dumbfounds and fathers education levels. One exception is the study by Kohn, Manski and Mundel (1976). This study estimates a model using subsamples of the SCOPE survey from two different states. While one group shows that the fathers education level has a greater effect on t he likelihood of college attendance than does the mothers, the other group shows the mothers education level as having a greater effect. SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 6 MATHTECH, INC. B. INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS THAT AFFECT COLLEGE ENROLLMENT.In addition to the factors that operate at an individual level, researchers have found a variety of institutional factors, or factors pertaining to educational and vocational alternatives, that affect college enrollment levels. Manski and Wise (1983) include among these factors tuition level, quality of school (as measured by the average combined SAT score of incoming freshmen), and the availability of government and institutional financial aid.Rouse (1994) examines the factor of proximity by estimating changes in enrollments that would result from decreasing the averagedistance to the nearest 2-year college. She also considers the effects of tuition levels and financial aid availability, as well unemployment rates, which serve as a measure of com peting opportunities available to high school seniors.Tuition levels are another institutional factor with a significant effect on college enrollment. Leslie and Brinkman (1987) review 25 studies on this subject, and find a general consensus that a $100 increase in tuition nationwide, in 19821983 academic year dollars, would result in a 6 percent decline in the college participation rate for the 18- to 24-year-old group.Savoca (1990) makes the point that high tuition levels may lessen postsecondary enrollments in the aggregate by discouraging some students from ever applying to college. The effects of tuition levels are moderated in many cases by the effects of financial aid. McPherson and Schapiro (1991) state that the variable of interest should be net cost, or tuition less financial aid. At the initial stages of the enrollment decision, however, students often lack information on their eligibility for financial aid and the amount of aid they would be likely to receive.Researchers have differing views regarding the effects of financial aid on enrollment at different types of institutions. Reyes (1994) finds that increases in financial aid positively affect both 2-year and 4-year college enrollment rates, based on information from the NLSY and HSB. Manski and Wise (1983), using the NLS72, conclude that financial aid affects students decisions to attend 2-year institutions, as opposed to not going to college at all. However, this study finds that enrollments at 4-year schools have little sensitivity to the availability of financial aid.Manski and Wise do not consider the effect of financial aid on the students choice between a 2-year and a 4-year institution. SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 MATHTECH, INC. Other researchers have compared the effects of decreasing tuition with the effects of increasing financial aid. Manski and Wise (1983) find that for those attending 2-year schools, an additional dollar of financial aid would be worth more than a one dollar re duction in tuition. St. John (1990172) also finds that college applicantsare more responsive to changes in student aid than to changes in tuition, except for those in the upper income group. Kane (1995), however, argues that while financial aid increases may be more equitable because they are factor tested, they are not as effective as decreases in tuition. This is a consequence of the complexity of the financial aid application process and the unwillingness of low income families to borrow to finance a college education. When studying the effect of tuition and financial aid on PSE enrollment, the group to be especially concerned about is low income students.Leslie and Brinkman (1987) and Savoca (1990) find that tuition levels affect enrollment decisions for low income students much more than for middle and upper income groups. By the same token, the availability of financial aid is a much more crucial factor for those at lower income levels. Orfield (1992) strains that the maximu m Pell grant is less than one-fifth of the tuition at an elite university. Such a gap between aid and costs, he contends, may steer many low income students toward lower cost schools. Hearns 1991 study supports this hypothesis.He finds that when academic ability, achievement, and other factors are controlled for, lower income students are especially likely to choose institutions of lower selectivity. Schwartz (1985) finds that low income students are affected differently by publicly provided financial aid and aid supplied by institutions. He states that public grants tend to promote greater equity among income groups in college enrollment. Private grants, however, are often awarded on the basis of academic ability, and they tend to favor students who could afford to go to college without them.Clotfelter (1991) expresses the same concern about the effects of institutional aid. Manski and Wise (1983) note that even public aid is not always awarded where the need is greatest. They stat e that in 1979, 59 percent of Basic Educational Opportunity Grants were awarded to students who would probably have gone to college in the absence of such aid. Table 1 summarizes the data sources used in the studies mentioned here. SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 8 MATHTECH, INC.Table 1 MAIN entropy SOURCES FOR WORKS CITED IN LITERATURE REVIEW STUDY Borus, Michael E.and Carpenter, Susan A. , Factors Associated with College Attendance of High-School Seniors (1984) Clotfelter, Charles T. , Demand for Undergraduate Education (1991) Hauser, Robert M. , Trends in College Entry among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics (1993) Hearn, James C. , Academic and Nonacademic Influences on the College Destinations of 1980 High School Graduates (1991) Hossler, Don, Braxton, John and Coopersmith, Georgia, Understanding College Choice (1989).Hossler, Don and Maple, Sue, Being Undecided about Postsecondary Education (1993) Jackson, Gregory A., Did College Choice Change during the Seventies? (1988) Kane, Th omas, Rising Public College Tuition and College Entry How nearly Do Public Subsidies Promote approach path to College? (1995) Kohn, Meir G. , Manski, Charles F. , and Mundel, David S. , An Empirical Investigation of Factors which Influence College-going Behavior (1976) Leslie, Larry L. , and Brinkman, Paul T. , bookman Price Response in high Education (1987) Manski, Charles F. , and Wise, David A. , College Choice in America (1983) Manski, Charles F. , Income and Higher Education (1992)McPherson, Michael S., and Schapiro, Morton Owen, Does Student Aid Affect College Enrollment? New Evidence on a Persistent argument (1991) Mortenson, Thomas G. , and Wu, Zhijun, High School Graduation and College Participation of Young Adults by Family Income Backgrounds 1970 to 1989 (1990) National Center for Education Statistics. Confronting the Odds Students At Risk and the Pipeline to Higher Education (1997). MAIN DATA SOURCES 1979 and 1980 National Longitudinal Surveys of Labor Market Experi ence, Youth Cohort (NLSY) Review of studies done by others, with data from Current race Survey (CPS) and High.School and Beyond (HSB) CPS HSB, Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) data Review of studies done by others Cluster sample of 5,000 atomic number 49 ninth graders National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972 (NLS72), HSB NLSY, HSB, CPS School to College Opportunities for Postsecondary Education (SCOPE) Survey Meta-analysis of studies done by others NLS72 NLS72, HSB, CPS accommodative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) data, CPS HSB, Current Population Report, CPS NELS SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW.9 MATHTECH, INC. STUDY Orfield, Gary, Money, Equity, and College Access (1992) Reyes, Suzanne, The College Enrollment Decision The utilisation of the Guaranteed Student Loan (1994) Rouse, Cecilia Elena, What to Do after High School The Two-Year versus Four-Year College Enrollment Decision (1994) St. John, Edward P. , and Noell, Jay, The Effects of Stude nt Financial Aid on Access to Higher Education An Analysis of Progress with Special Consideration of Minority Enrollment (1989) St. John, Edward P., Price Response in Enrollment DecisionsAn Analysis of the High School and Beyond Sophomore Cohort (1990) Savoca, Elizabeth, Another Look at the Demand for Higher Education Measuring the Price Sensitivity of the Decision to Apply to College (1990) Schwartz, J. Brad, Student Financial Aid and the College Enrollment Decision The Effects of Public and Private Grants and Interest Subsidies (1985) Schwartz, J. Brad, Wealth Neutrality in Higher Education The Effects of Student Grants (1986) MAIN DATA SOURCES Review of history of federal student financial aid programs NLSY, HSB NLSY, HSB, CPS.NLS72, HSB HSB NLS72 HSB, CPS HSB, CPS SECTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 MATHTECH, INC. III. DATA A. NELS DATA While a number of studies have used data from the National Longitudinal Survey, Youth Cohort (NLSY), the National Longitudinal Study of the High Sc hool Class of 1972 (NLS72), and the High School and Beyond Survey (HSB) to examine the factors affecting college enrollments, this work effort is among the first to use NELS to analyze these types of issues. In 1988, NELS initially surveyed over 24,000 public and cloak-and-dagger school eighth graders throughout the United States.The nationally representative eighth grade cohort was tested in four subjects ( maths, reading, science, and social studies). Two teachers of each student (representing two of the four subjects) were also surveyed, as was an administrator from each school. On average, each of the 1,052 participating schools was represented by 24 students and five teachers. Parents were also surveyed, providing researchers with detailed information on family background variables.Since 1988, the initial eighth grade cohort has been re-surveyed three times (and has been freshened with new sample members). The first follow-up of NELS ( inauguration, 1990), included the same co mponents as the base year study, with the exception of the parent survey, which was not implemented in the 1990 round. It also included a component on early dropouts (those who left school between the end of eighth grade and the end of 10th grade). The second follow-up (spring, 1992), repeated all components of the first follow-up study and also included a parent questionnaire.However, this time only one teacher of each student ( all a mathematics or a science teacher) was asked to complete a teacher questionnaire. High school transcript data were also collected for these students. A subsample of the NELS88 second follow-up sample was again followed-up in the spring of 1994, when most sample members had been out of high school for 2 years. In all, 14,915 students were surveyed, most through computer-assisted shout interviewing.Major content areas for the third follow-up questionnaire were education histories work experience histories work-related training family formation opinions and other experiences occurrence or SECTION III. DATA 11 MATHTECH, INC. non-occurrence of significant life events and income. Data collection for this wave began on February 4, and ended on August 13, 1994. At the time the data were collected, most of the respondents were 2 years out of high school. Table 2 summarizes the components of the different waves of the surveys.Table 2 OVERVIEW OF NELS NELS Components Grades included Cohort Base Year Spring term 1988 grade 8 students questionnaire, tests questionnaire questionnaire two teachers per student (taken from reading, mathematics, science, or social studies) First complete Spring term 1990 modal grade = sophomore students, dropouts questionnaire, tests none questionnaire two teachers per student (taken from reading, mathematics, science, or social studies) Second Follow-up Spring term 1992 modal grade = senior students, dropouts questionnaire, tests, H. S.transcripts questionnaire questionnaire one teacher per student (taken from mathematics or science).Third Follow-up Spring 1994 H. S. + 2 years all individuals questionnaire none none none Parents Principals Teachers B. NPSAS DATA Because the NELS database does not contain detailed information on financial aid, the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) database is used to supplement our study with additional financial aid information. This database is used to predict financial aid for the respondents in NELS based on demographic and other characteristics that are available in both databases.NPSAS is constructed specifically to provide information on financing of postsecondary education, so it is a wide-cut candidate for this use. This database surveys a nationally representative sample of undergraduate, graduate, and first-professional students attending less than 2-year, 2-year, 4-year, and doctoral granting institutions. Both students who receive and those who do not receive financial aid are surveyed. SECTION III. DATA 12 MATHTECH, INC. The 1 993 NPSAS study collected information on more than 78,000 undergraduate and graduate students at about 1,100 institutions.To be eligible, students must have been enrolled between May 1, 1992 and April 30, 1993 at a postsecondary institution in the United States or Puerto Rico. The students had to be enrolled in courses for credit, and in a program of 3 months or longer. Also eligible for inclusion were students who received a bachelors degree between July 1, 1992 and June 30, 1993. Students who were enrolled in a GED program or who were also enrolled in high school were not included. C. SAMPLE AND WEIGHTS Of the 14,915 respondents in the third NELS follow-up, 13,120 are represented in all four waves of the NELS data.The remaining 1,795 respondents are either first follow-up freshened students,4 second follow-up freshened students,5 base-year ineligibles,6 or base-year eligible students who declined to participate in one or more of the survey waves, but who did participate in the thi rd survey wave. The breakdown of these 1,795 respondents is as follows 501 first follow-up freshened students, 102 second follow-up freshened students, 271 base-year ineligibles, and 921 base-year eligibles with missing survey waves.To take advantage of the longitudinal nature of the NELS data and to be consistent across models and issues in the report, we focus our work on the sample of 13,120 respondents represented in all four waves of the NELS data. Consequently, the weight used in our analyses, (F3PNLWT) applies to sample members who completed questionnaires in all four rounds of NELS88. As a result, the longitudinal analyses that we conduct, and the estimates that are produced in this study can only be used to make projections to the population of spring 1988 eighth graders.In the descriptive tables, all percentages are weighted using F3PNLWT, including the analyses with the high school transcript data. Those who were tenth graders in 1990 but were not in the base-year consum e frame, either because they were not in the country or because they were not in the eighth grade in the spring term of 1988. Those who were 12th graders in 1992 but were not in either the base year or first follow-up sampling frames, either because they were not in the country or because they were not in the eighth (10th) grade in the spring term of 1988 (1990).6 5 4 Students excluded in 1988 collectable to linguistic, mental, or physical obstacles to participation. 13 SECTION III. DATA MATHTECH, INC. This sample includes dropouts, since the purpose of this study is to examine the overall question of what characteristics of eighth graders in 1988 are related to PSE attendance. We focus on early indicators, such as educational expectations and course-taking behavior in the eighth grade, and not on the pipeline of high school experiences that a dropout would lack access to.However, the dropouts were not asked the same set of survey questions as the other respondents, and, therefore, some of the analysis does not include dropouts. For each of our tables or figures, we note whether or not the dropouts are included in the analysis. D. CORRECTED STANDARD ERRORS Because NELS data are collected through a multi-stage sampling scheme, calculation of standard errors through standard methods can understate these errors. The sampling technique used in NELS is a selection of schools, and then within schools, a selection of students.With this sampling method, the observations of different students may not be independent from one another. Stata, the statistical software used for analysis in this report, corrects the standard errors for these sampling techniques. Except for multinomial logit models, for which this correction is not available, survey correction techniques are used, and we note whenever the corrections are not used. However, we have found that such corrections do not have a large effect on our results, and therefore, we present all results with confidence. E. VARIABLE DEFINITIONS.The appendix to this study contains definitions of the key variables used in our analysis. For each key variable, we describe how we constructed the variable and we list the names of the NELS variables used in the construction. SECTION III. DATA 14 MATHTECH, INC. IV. WHO GOES TO COLLEGE? A. WHAT PROPORTION OF STUDENTS ATTEND COLLEGE, AND WHAT TYPE OF COLLEGE DID THEY ATTEND? We begin our analysis by examining the demographics of postsecondary school choice and discussing our main findings regarding college attendance rates and types of postsecondary education (PSE) attended.As shown in Table 3, a majority of 1988 eighth graders attend some type of PSE by 1994. Overall, 62. 7 percent of the respondents attend PSE. (Note that in all of the tables in this report, all percentages are weighted. ) Students are most likely to attend a 4-year public or a less than 4-year public school. Approximately 24 percent of the students attend each of these types of schools. Next most common are 4-year private schools. Just over 11 percent of the respondents attend 4-year private schools.Only 4 percent of the respondents attend less than 4-year private schools. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents do not attend any type of PSE. Women are slightly more likely than men to attend PSE. While 60 percent of men attend PSE, 65 percent of women attend. Women are more likely than men to attend 4-year private schools and less than 4-year private schools. Native Americans, Blacks, and Hispanics are least likely to attend PSE and Asians and Pacific Islanders are most likely to attend PSE.Hispanics are most likely to attend less than 4year private schools. Students whose parents have higher education levels are much more likely to attend PSE. While only 33 percent of students whose parents have less than a high school education attend PSE, 90 percent of students whose parents have an advanced degree attend PSE. SECTION IV. WHO GOES TO COLLEGE? 15 MATHTECH, INC. Table 3 DEMOGRAPHICS OF POSTSECONDARY SCHOOL CHOICE1 No PSE 4-Year Public 4-Year Private.

Jay Gatsby Character Analysis Essay

The character Jay Gatsby, also known as James Gatz, is the key character in The Great Gatsby. He started out as a poor farmers son in North Dakota, and dropped out of college in Minnesota. He united the military and during training meets Daisy, a beautiful rich wo valet de chambre living nearby, whom he falls in delight with. Gatsby is soon shipped out for the war. Daisy then marries tom turkey Buchanan who is a rich aristocrat whose social rest is the same as Daisys, her ideal partner. Gatsby becomes rich from bootlegging after coming back from the war to inculcate and win back Daisy.Jay Gatsby carries a dark shroud more or less his past which makes him very somber to other characters in the book as well as to readers. Gatsby is an extremely generous man considering his roots as a poor farmers son. He claims to come from money but he was actually the son of a very poor farmer in North Dakota. Coming from no money he throws around his money frivolously uniform he of all sequ ence wished he could as a young boy. Gatsby throws parties every weekend, which anyone can attend and have a good time. At his parties there is endlessly plenty of food and much to drink as well as music and dancing.At one of his parties, a woman named Lucille tore her rig on a chair, Gatsby heard of this and asked her for her name and address. Gatsby then bought her a new dress worth $265 and sent it to her within a week. When I was here last I tore my gown on a chair I got a package from Croiriers with a new evening gown in it (Fitzgerald 43). Gatsby buys the dress because loves to flaunt his money for people to see how rich he is, and for Daisy to see how rich hes become. He also darkers knap, Gatsbys neighbor and Daisys cousin, a job in his business knowing he might need a little more money.Even though pass didnt take Gatsby up on his job offer it still shows that Gatsby trusts Nick and is a generous gesture. Gatsby is also generous in taking the blame for the remainder of Myrtle, Toms secret lover. It may not be of any monetary value but he loves Daisy enough to take the murder off her hands and take the blame himself. Gatsbys generosity is a great attribute to his character, however most know him for the mystique and enigmatic presence. Jay Gatsby is quite the intriguing and mysterious character. Everyone attends his parties yet no one seems to really know anything round him.He makes grandiose claims of graduating from Oxford but cant prove it, which adds a bit of mystique to his past, whether its treacherously or real. Since many of the partygoers know little to nothing of Gatsby, many rumors are spread by dint ofout the party. Hes a bootlegger and One time he killed a man who had found out that he was nephew to Von Hindenburg and second cousin to the devil (Fitzgerald 61) were some rumors spread about the second party Nick attended. The rumors differed from person to person but someone always seemed to have a different perspective of Jay Gatsb y.When Nick is introducing Tom, Daisys husband, to Gatsby he disappears when Nick isnt looking, and Nick doesnt know why he left, or where he went. Gatsby left Nick alone with Tom because he didnt want to meet with the man who stole Daisy from him. Nick, essentially macrocosm Gatsbys only friend in the novel, is lied to by Gatsby about his past, but eventually after things dont add up Gatsby lets the truth out. With years of telling lies Gatsby feels relieved to finally be able to tell someone the truth about himself.His roots of being a farmers son to being a rich man living in West Egg is suspicious to begin with. just now saying that his money came from some wealthy people in the middle west (Fitzgerald 65) isnt convincing. Gatsby uses his past to make a false social stand up and to gain respect. However his facade has too many holes in it and soon his lies begin to catch up with him. His career in bootlegging has him running around with shady characters and disappearing from time to time. If his money wasnt dirty, which he claims it isnt then hed have no reason to associate with gangsters such as Meyer Wolfsheim.The mystery surrounding Gatsby in the novel pales in comparison to the passion and devotion he carries for Daisy throughout the story. Jay Gatsby becomes devoted to winning the love of Daisy after hearing that she married Tom Buchanan. Even after the war and his shady business with Wolfsheim, Daisy is still the only woman in Gatsbys heart. Gatsby becomes rich through bootlegging, which he could have gone to jail for just to get Daisys attention. Since Daisy is such a shallow woman Gatsby had to use riches and social standing to make her love him.He buys a mansion in West Egg and flaunts his money and makes extravagant stories so he can be held at a high enough level to be with Daisy. Gatsby throws enormous parties every weekend in order to lure Daisy in by chance, however he never gets a reunion with his beloved until he meets Nick, Daisys cous in. Gatsby invited Nick to one of his parties to meet and befriend Nick, soon after he asked Nick to plume the reunion. Nick is more like a stepping stone for Gatsby to get to Daisy than a friend, he takes Nick out as a friend but always seems distant.After Gatsby and Daisy meet for the first time in 5 years Gatsby shows her around his mansion to impress her, and it works. That huge place there? she cried pointing. (Fitzgerald 90). I love it (Fitzgerald 90). Later on after the affair Daisy and Gatsby are having gets a little more serious and Gatsby tries to make Daisy tell Tom that she never loved him. Gatsbys only dream is for Daisy to leave Tom for him, but it is shattered because Daisy and Tom have a daughter and Daisy wont leave Tom because he provides her with security.Tom comes from old money and he has a family with Daisy but Gatsby has new money from bootlegging, and still risks going to jail. His devotion doesnt end there, when Daisy hits Toms lover Myrtle and leaves the scene without stopping, Gatsby takes the blame for the incident trying to protect Daisy. He even waits outside Daisys window to ensure that Tom doesnt try to hurt her. His devotion for Daisy is so deep that he ends up dying for her, when Wilson, Myrtles husband, kills him thinking he ran over his wife.Gatsbys unrequited love for Daisy eventually blossoms into an affair, but ultimately is the reason for his demise. Jay Gatsby, the main character of F. Scott Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby holds a very large presence in the story. He is very shady in the beginning, always hiding and never being out in the open. He starts to show us a little about himself and becomes a bit understood, until his past doesnt seem to add up. Once the truth comes out it leaves a bit of mystery around his movement in the story. The clouded past of James Gatz arouses curiosity of what hes really up to and a mystery of what hell do next.

Tax Evasion and Tax Audit

Definition of Tax Evasion Tax evasion usually entails taxpayers deliberately misrepresenting or concealing the authoritative state of their affairs to the tax authorities to reduce their tax liability and includes in particular dishonest tax reporting, such as declaring less income, profits or gains than actually earned or overstating deductions,. It is an illegal practice where a person, organization or corporation intentionally avoids paying his/her/its true tax liability. Examples of practices which are considered tax evasion Knowingly not reporting income * Under-reporting income (claiming less income than you actually received from a specific source * Providing false entropy to the NBR about business income or expenses * Deliberately underpaying taxes owed * Substantially understating your taxes (by stating a tax amount on your return which is less than the amount owed for the income you reported). Tax Audit A tax scrutinise is an investigation into the background of tax retu rns submitted by an individual or business to a tax agency.While it is true that a tax audit may be called due to some perceived irregularity in one or more returns, it is also true that an audit may be done simply as part of a random sampling. Tax audit is when the IRS decides to examine your tax return a little more most and verify that your income and deductions are accurate. Tax return is chosen for audit when something you have entered on your return is out of the ordinary. There are three main types of IRS audits the put up audit, the office audit and the field audit.

Law AS †causation model answer Essay

There are two types of causation which are necessary to establish criminal liability. These are factual causation and cause in honor (also known as legal causation).Factual causation means that the defendant can only be found guilty if the consequence would not thrust happened but for the defendants conduct. This was seen in the case of Pagett (1982). Similarly, a defendant cannot be found guilty if the victims death was unrelated to the defendants actions (as in White, 1910).Legal causation, where the actions of D must be found to have caused the consequence, can be established as long as the fibril of causation (between the act and the consequence) has not been broken.There are a number of ways in which this chain can be broken, Firstly, through the act of a third party, an example of which is medical treatment that is deemed to be palpably wrong such(prenominal) as that seen in Jordan (1956) Secondly, where the victims own act is so daft as to not be reasonably expected, as se en in Williams (1992) Finally, as a result of a natural but unpredictable event, such as a flood or an earthquake.Despite external factors, the chain of causation is not deemed to have been broken as long as the Ds actions are more than a minimal cause of the consequence. Similarly, the defendant must also take the defendant as they find them. This is known as the thin skull rule (as seen in Blaue 1975), meaning that there is legal causation even if Ds actions would not have caused those consequences in a well-ordered or normal person.

American Nurses Association Essay

According to American Nurses Association website, nursing- sensitive indicators are defined as the structure, process and outcomes of nursing care (nursingworld.org). Quality care for patients in the hospital is important to their healing process. It is important to know what the nursing-sensitive indicators are and how they affect patients. The indicators are intend to focus plans and programs to increase quality and safety in patient care. In this scenario with Mr. J, many members of the healthcare team were not doing enough to make sure he was safe and that his require were met to the fullest. Knowing what the nursing- sensitive indicators are could have helped prevent Mr. J from developing a pressure ulcer and making sure he was getting the correct diet.The healthcare team responsible for Mr. J did not advocate for him like they should have and let things slip when they should have been reported and taken care of. Understanding nursing-sensitive indicators can help nurses deliv er the best care possible to their patients and help minimize complications and increase patient satisfaction. Some of the issues that happened with Mr. Js case could have led to more serious complications. Restraining Mr.J when it was not necessary increased his chance of developing a pressure ulcer and could to a fault have led to further serious complications such as developing post surgical complications such a deep vein thrombosis which would increase his impediment in the hospital. Another example that could have been avoided was making sure that Mr. J was receiving the correct food for his diet. The healthcare team did not address Mr. Js incorrect dietary meal in a timely manner which could have led to a more serious event. Not addressing patient needs will decrease patient satisfaction, which is one of the nursing-sensitive indicators.